Map
I map the task, agent actions, risk points, user decisions and current failure modes.
AI AGENT UX / HUMAN–AI INTERACTION
I design one critical AI workflow around trust, autonomy, progress, approval and recovery—so users know what the agent is doing, what it needs from them and what happens when it gets something wrong.
THE INTERFACE IS THE TRUST LAYER
Traditional software waits for users to act. AI agents can plan, decide and execute on a user's behalf. That changes the UX problem from “which button comes next?” to “how much should the system do, what should it reveal and when should the user intervene?”
WHAT I DESIGN
HUMAN–AI UX SPRINT
I map the task, agent actions, risk points, user decisions and current failure modes.
I redesign the flow around the right autonomy, visibility, approval and recovery patterns.
You get the interaction states, reusable AI-specific patterns and implementation notes your team can build from.
COMMON QUESTIONS
Usually not. I extend the existing product system with the AI-specific components and states the workflow needs—such as progress, confidence, review, approval, intervention and recovery.
Not necessarily. Users need enough evidence and system state to make a decision. The interface should explain outcomes, status and risk without dumping internal model mechanics into the product.
It depends on consequence and reversibility. Low-risk reversible actions can often run with less friction; high-impact or novel actions need stronger review, permission or approval boundaries.
A redesigned critical flow with the relevant AI states, interaction rules and implementation-ready specifications. Scope is fixed before the sprint begins.
START WITH ONE REAL FLOW
I will tell you where trust breaks, what should be redesigned first and what a bounded Human–AI UX sprint would include.
Send the AI flow